Showing posts with label Red To Kill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Red To Kill. Show all posts

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Rape/Revenge is Back in Hong Kong




If you got into Hong Kong films in the last couple of years, you'd be forgiven (I guess) for not being familiar with the rape/revenge genre. These fine flicks, a staple of the late 80's and early 90's, traded in deliberately nauseating but stylish rape imagery, its grisly, traumatic aftermath, and the obligatory revenge. Usually, the revenge was far bloodier and more permanent than the rape itself. Traditionally, the rapist and his cohorts came to a sad end. If you want to get sticky with these beauties, I suggest a mini home movie festival. Be sure to include Red to Kill, Love to Kill, Her Vengeance, The Untold Story, Peeping Tom, The Rape After, Dr. Lamb, and Diary of a Serial Rapist. Most of these have been lovingly praised on this blog. I won't call them guilty pleasures as I experienced no shame enjoying them. Hopefully, you won't either. If you do, perhaps this blog is not in your future stars.


Juno Mak is a glutton for punishment in Revenge: A Love Story

If a return to Hong Kong-style rape-revenge gets your engine revving, please consider Ching-Po Wong's Revenge - a Love Story (Fuk sau che chi sei; 2010), a cracking, marginally improbably rape-revenge sickie with a generous helpings of perversion. Not surprisingly, I loved it. In addition to the traditional elements of this unfairly maligned genre, you get a Japanese porn actress (the mouth-watering Sora Aoi) leading the cast's vagina brigade, and you get a subplot involving fetus buns ripped from pregnant ovens. It would be spoiling matters to reveal the plot's specifics, but I'm going to step out on a limb and recommend this baby with minimal reservations.

As noted above, credibility does get its muscles strained towards the end, but my irritation faded when I wisely decided to accept that if you'd been stabbed and filled with bullets on several occasions, you'd still be capable of kicking rapist butt, anyway. You'd have a few minor abrasions and you'd limp like a three-legged mutt, but bullets and torture wouldn't prevent you from achieving your sociopathic goals.

 Actress Sora Aoi has a healthy adult film career in Japan

The film's lighting and post-grading are sensational thanks to the talented Jimmy Wong, who also shot the delightful Extreme Ecstasy: Sex and Zen, the 3-D must-see. Juno Mak, who plays the film's hero and victim by association, is superb in a physically demanding turn.  The film's fight choreography is solid, the gore is splashy, and the bad guy is one foul muthafucking see (c) you (u) next (n) tuesday (t). Where Revenge A Love Story rises to the upper ranks of its above-mentioned brethren is in its balls-to-the-wall portrayal of a sickeningly evil villain. This guy made me physically angry as he proposed raping a traumatized young woman and carried it out over and over again (in a police station, by Crikey!). Are the rape scenes full-on, you ask? They're not Red to Kill, but they're filmed to muster maximum outrage from the audience and they're lit like an expensive TV commercial for vomit.

Accolades must go to production company 852 Films and producers Andrew Ooi and Josie Ho for soldiering forth with yet another graphic horror pic that ignores China's recent influence on Hong Kong's movie production. Since the communists took back Hong Kong, their filthy, conservative influence has been felt in the colony, and films possessing the gruesome, lurid, graphic content that was once celebrated by the Category III rating have been as rare lately as penises at a lezbo gangbang. I reviewed 852's last film, Dream Home, in a recent blog, and, despite my admiration for it, had several reservations about its muddled structure. Revenge-A Love Story has no such structural deficits, and manages to unfold in a novel way thanks to a script that knows what it is and a director who squeezes maximum dramatic juice from its creative nipples.


 The Panorama Blu-Ray, recently released, sports a dashing, low contrast transfer (which suits the film's muted color scheme), and includes four mini movies centering on different aspects of the project.

I assume broader distribution is imminent. If it isn't, someone fucked up.

Some recent criticism that the film is hypocritical (rallying against violence while writhing in its excesses) is old news to me and predictable. Most rape-revenge thrillers are "guilty" of having it both ways. In fact, it's virtually impossible to make good exploitation without the moral outrage. The two have always gone hand in hand.  

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Filmmaking 104 - Shoot and Cut


In the 70's, professional quality film production was the domain of the well endowed (financially).

If you wanted to shoot on 16mm or 35mm, you paid handsomely for the privilege...or slept your way to success.

As a teenager, my only option was Super-8.

I bought a Chinon camera for $120 and purchased three minutes and twenty seconds of film stock at eight bucks a pop.

My part time job burning fries and squirting special sauce at McDonald's ("...the time to lean is the time to clean...") provided budget enough for six reels of film a month.

The Golden Arches financed my early "epics"

I edited in-camera at first, then moved on to a simple viewer and Hervic splicer for editing.

Jump forward to 2009 and, oh boy!, you guys and gals have sure got it good. At least technically.

Now you can shoot 'til the cows come home on tape or practice film stock discipline with P2 cards. The cards are still so damn expensive that they force you to shoot at a moderate ratio (unless you're handsomely funded, of course, and you've got a killer workflow going on); that's great training for bigger productions.

But what I thought I'd talk about briefly here is filmmaking on shoe strings. It's likely you'll be starting out with next to no budget. Or one equivalent to a shoe string, at least, which is little better than nothing at all.

Things are at a stage where you can purchase a digital camera that produces damn superb images that won't deteriorate terribly if you load them into a film recorder and produce a 35mm print.

Most digitally shot work won't end up on 35mm, but it's comforting to know that the resolution is there to do bump it up if necessary.

To produce low budget shorts or feature films, you will need a camera, memory cards or tapes, a solid tripod (Cartoni is a good one @ $1500)), a shotgun microphone such as a the Sennheiser 416 ($1000+), or the more economical Audio Technica shotgun mic ($550). You will also need lighting and reflectors. Never shoot outside without foam core reflectors (which you can make) or the type that can be unfolded (Flexfills).

I'd throw in a modest dolly with twelve feet of track, too; it makes a huge difference to the "look".

Camera choices are wide open. You have Sony, Canon, Panasonic, JVC, RED, and more.

You also have a variety of recording formats and a multitude of codecs. The Sony EX1/Ex3 ($5500 - $8000) gives you great pictures and records on SxS cards. The Panasonic AG-HVX200 (around $5000) is a great camera that allows you to shoot SD (Standard Def) on tape, and HD on P2 cards. P2 card media is expensive, but that will change shortly.
I'm in no position to recommend any one brand of camera; that part is up to you. But it's worth considering issues such as whether you want a camera that allows you to mount your own 35mm still camera lenses on it, or whether you're happy with the manufacturer's zoom. At minimum, go with a camera that has proper audio jacks, is weighted comfortably on your shoulder or in your hand for off-the-sticks shooting, and has a codec that is friendly with editing systems such as Final Cut Pro, Avid, and Premier.



You do need to pay upwards of $3500 for a decent camera. Anything less (generally speaking) will not deliver what you expect, which is high quality.
For editing, I prefer Macs, and I prefer Final Cut Pro (FCP 6 is the latest). That's just a personal choice. There's not a right or wrong configuration. Whatever works for ya.

Right now you can snag an Apple Mac Desktop Computer Workstation for around $4500.
You won't go wrong with a 2.93GHz 8-core system with the Intel Xeon chip, 2 GB (2x1GB) RAM, ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB Graphics, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard.

It's a start.

Other helpful software: Photoshop, Illustrator, Dreamweaver, Poser, Shade.

FCP comes with Motion, Soundtrack and Compressor, of course.

It's a given that all this is useless is you're not working from a script that has been rewritten and rewritten until it shines with potential.

Before you start shooting, get to know your camera, the lenses and establish workflow that works for you. Keep in mind that when exposing your digital images (always exposure manually), always underexpose (to what degree varies). You'll have to play around with this, but such is the nature of the medium's electronics. Only shoot when you are happy with the tests you have done. You don't want to be experimenting and testing with real actors DURING your shoot.

As for shooting, what can I tell you?

Only this: If you have time, get as much coverage as possible. Plan your shots carefully. Rehearse for the actors and for the camera. If you are determined to cover an entire scene in one amazing, ground-breaking, never-been-done-before shot, still get some "safe" coverage when you're done. Don't argue! The problem with single take shots is they leave you with no room to play if they aren't quite working. You can turn them into a series of jump cuts, of course, but that mightn't be in keeping with the rest of your film's cutting style. Extra coverage gives you options in the edit suite. Great inspiration on the set isn't always so great when you get to the edit.

One man who didn't believe in coverage.

Never shoot just one shot for a scene. Always shoot an alternative. Give yourself an "out" if your grand plan fucks up. You'll look like a pro, and, most importantly, you'll save the skin of your movie.

Now more than ever, it is a great time to make your own movies, and it's heartening to know that you can produce stuff that can stand alongside the best.

Oh, yeah, and if you're planning a Wobble Cam feature film, please kill yourself, and save us the nausea.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

All Classics, All Problematic

Bill Lustig's Maniac ('80)

POSITIVES

* Has a foul, depressing, sleazy atmosphere.
* Is ultra-violent (thanks to Tom Savini's vivid make-up effects).
* Boasts an amazing Joe Spinell performance.
* Has a terrific Jay Chataway score (available).
* Throws ex-Hammer beauty Caroline Munroe into the mix.
* Features numerous, bloody mannequins and dolls.
* Tom Savini's head gets blown off with a shotgun and we get to stare at the neck stump as it spurts blood.

NEGATIVES

Relationship between Spinell and Munroe is ridiculous.


Billy Tang's Red To Kill ('94).

POSITIVES

* Fetid atmosphere of menace
*
Is set in a hospital for the physically and mentally disabled
* Features half a dozen brutal, beautifully shot rape scenes
* Musical score is menacing and disturbing
* Lead actress is cute and subjected to horrific humiliation
* Boasts a graphic scene in which lead actress rips out her pubic hair and says "Dirty, dirty, dirty" over and over again
* Delivers a mid-film plot surprise that further brutalizes a rape victim
* Ends violently
* Has no compunctions about offending everyone

NEGATIVES

* Actors playing the disabled are out of control (they are parodies)
* Story has zero credibility


Billy Tang's Run and Kill ('93)

POSITIVES

* Has an award-winning psycho performance from Simon Yam
* Stunning cinematography
* Gruesome, sadistic, tough as nails staging of violence
* Boasts the protracted burning to death of a little girl
* Psycho has a conversation with the charred remains of said girl
* The head of said girl is knocked off
* Enthusiastic use of large, sharp knives
* Depicts garroting in a gleeful manner
* Features a big, fat man (Kent Chang) in a sympathetic lead role
* Gives us Chang's mother plunging to her death
* Increasingly nihilistic atmosphere
* Danny Lee plays a cop (again)
* Fetishistic attention given to scenes of retribution
* Depressing score that offers no hope

NEGATIVES

* Slow to get going
* Not an entirely believable set-up
* Some silly music over opening scenes


Dr. Lamb
('92), directed by Billy Tang and Danny Lee.

POSITIVES

* Stunning photography by Kin Fai Miu
* Outstanding lead performance by Simon Yam
* Argento-esque climax
* Exquisitely directed scenes of necrophilia
* Realistic breast removal and amateur surgery
* Expertly staged moving car sequences
* Chilling score
* Inspired use of rain
* Bloody dismemberment with an electric saw
* Solid direction
* Fast pace
* Wallows in bodily fluids and every paraphilia imaginable

NEGATIVES

* Inappropriate and disruptive use of black humor such as a flying, severed breast landing on the back of a policewoman.
* This type of humor didn't do The Untold Story any favors, either.

Your thoughts?