Showing posts with label Run and Kill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Run and Kill. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
The True Horror of Silence
This movie -- Silenced (Do-ga-ni/; Korean, 2010) -- is really something else. The one current imdb review gives it high praise and pretty much parallels my take on it. It opened last week at a very limited amount of cinemas, is UNRATED for very good reason, and is a major dose of heart-wrenching bleakness. That it is based on a true story that ended tragically makes watching it almost unbearable.
The story involves a school for the deaf where very young students (pre-teen boys and girls) are being beaten, raped, and intimidated by senior faculty members and their immediate family members. If it weren't true, it would sound outrageously improbable. In his LA Times review last Friday, critic Kenneth Turan attacked the film for sensationalizing the sexual crimes. I disagree that the graphic depictions of child abuse are included for the sake of sensationalism. They are included because they need to be. We need to see and feel what these children went through in order to fully comprehend how barbarically they were treated by their carers at the school and by the corrupt Korean court system. Not surprisingly, "important" and influential men were protected by the court as their victims were denied justice.
At the center of the film is a young male teacher (Gong Yoo) who suspects the children are being abused almost immediately after beginning employment there. When he witnesses a shockingly brutal beating of a young male student by a colleague, his desire to intervene is natural and strong, but he encounters opposition driven by different agendas from the school's principal and his own mother. It's a human rights worker who provides him the courage to fight a very broken system.
The first half of Silenced (the literal Korean title is Crucible) involves the teacher's discovery of the school's dirty secrets. The second half focuses on a court case in which the children take the witness stand in front of their abusers. Some crimes are recreated. All recreations are beyond what you'd see in an American or British film, although works such as Tim Roth's The War Zone and Angelica Huston's Bastard Out of Carolina carry some of the same dramatic weight.
Silenced is obligatory viewing for many reasons, but the primary one is its courage. When Kenneth Turan criticizes the film for its "sensationalism", he's taking an easy swing at it. How should the film's horrors be conveyed, Kenneth? Should they be less shocking? More palatable to you as a viewer? Suitable for the average American viewer? Sanitized enough for a PG rating?
Fuck that! I can't help but reflect on stories we hear often about politicians who give their support to controversial laws -- stem cell research, for example -- after the life of a family member is saved. These changes of heart sicken me because they are the disgraceful folly of men with narrow, insular visions who are unable to empathize with the struggles of people (voters!) outside their immediate circles. Only when these idiots come face to face with the real possibility of loss do they do what they should have done long ago. The recreations of ugly, intimidating sex crimes against children do need to be graphic because graphic hits home. But it's not the sex that bruises the viewer of Silenced -- it's the violent intimidation that accompanies it. We see, in a way never conveyed so bluntly and brilliantly before, that the most heinous aspect of rape (of children and adults) is the intimidation of the victim by the cowardly rapist. The physical aspect of the rape ends, but the intimidation is maintained by the rapist, his family, the general public, and the courts. It's an endless nightmare.
Aspects of Silenced reminded me of Dr. Lamb because, from a photographic point of view, the recreations are rich and moody. The film's grim tone echoes Blood and Bone, The War Zone, and Run and Kill. It's not a horror film in any traditional genre sense (there are no Freddy Krugers here), but it certainly explores horrific material, material more deeply disturbing than the recent Serbian Movie because the intimidation scenes accompanying the sexual abuse make the drama real.
Highly recommended for those not irritated by the sticky grit of truth.
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Not Quite A Dream Home
Technically, this is an accomplished Hong Kong horror film. The cinematography is slick and moody, the central performance by Josie Ho is strong, and the direction by Ho-Cheung Pang is solid (mostly). It's a Cat III flick, so the violence and gore are piled on thick. There are half a dozen jaw-dropping, super-inventive kill sequences that are blissfully free of restraint. This is not one of those pulled back Hong Kong horror films that is pandering to the more conservative Mainland censors -- and audiences.
So hats off to the producers Conroy Chan Chi-Chung, Subi Liang, and Andrew Ooi for a job (technically) well done.
A great film, however, is supported by a strong script. Unfortunately, the Dream Home script is an awful, schizophrenic mess. According to the rear sleeve of the Blu-ray, the film is about a Hong Kong woman (Ho) who buys an apartment in Hong Kong's insane property market. She can't make the payments, so she resorts to murder. Well, no, that's not why she resorts to murder, and she doesn't ever buy an apartment.
The film mostly focuses on Ho murdering people in the years leading up to her near purchase of an apartment. It flashes back and forth between the murders, her childhood, and present day Hong Kong where she works two jobs in order to save extra pennies. The marginally important background we get on her is that she had an abusive loser of a father and a little brother. Occasionally, she got beaten, too. A present day addition to this mess is Ho's pointless relationship with a married man. She meets him in expensive hotels you rent by the hour and gets left with the tab. This relationship makes her character look like an idiot.
It's not clear at all why Ho has become a murderer. At one point, her murders have lowered the value of an apartment she's eyeballing, but we never get a connecting line between her actions and intentions. We are not shown why someone who appears to be relatively sane turned into a serial killer at some point. And not a very good one, either. Her murders are sloppy, she hangs around after the corpses have hit the floor, and she skulks around hallways with blood on her face.
The film, ultimately, is nuts, and not in a good way. Either everything fell apart during the edit (the endless flashbacks and flash-forwards suggest that) or they went with a script that existed but was not ready to be filmed. Clearly, the priority here was violence, and there's lots of that to go around, but why is the screenplay (credited to Pang, Kwok Cheung Tsang and Chi-Man Wan) so bloody fragmented and illogical? There are bits and pieces of interesting threads everywhere, but nothing is expanded upon or dramatically explored. Once I reached the half way point, I couldn't help but contemplate what a missed opportunity it was. They had everything at their disposal except a script that made sense. It's a great shame because I like Josie Ho a lot (I met her once and found her to be lovely), she has plans to make more films with these producers, and her sensibility is in the right place. Next time, I hope she'll take a closer look at the script and ask herself: What is this really about? And does its follow its theme through to the end in a clear and dramatic way?
Finally, I called Pang's direction "mostly" solid above because a director's most important job is to make a story work dramatically. If it doesn't work on the page, it's not going to work on the screen. This doesn't work dramatically, so Pang didn't do that part of his job.
To be fair, it's good to see a Hong Kong flick that revisits, on a gore level, at least, some of the glorious excesses of the 80's typified by such classics as Love To Kill, Run and Kill, Underground Banker, and Her Vengeance.
Still worth seeing? I think so.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
All Classics, All Problematic
Bill Lustig's Maniac ('80)POSITIVES
* Has a foul, depressing, sleazy atmosphere.
* Is ultra-violent (thanks to Tom Savini's vivid make-up effects).
* Boasts an amazing Joe Spinell performance.
* Has a terrific Jay Chataway score (available).
* Throws ex-Hammer beauty Caroline Munroe into the mix.
* Features numerous, bloody mannequins and dolls.
* Tom Savini's head gets blown off with a shotgun and we get to stare at the neck stump as it spurts blood.
NEGATIVES
Relationship between Spinell and Munroe is ridiculous.

Billy Tang's Red To Kill ('94).
POSITIVES
* Fetid atmosphere of menace
* Is set in a hospital for the physically and mentally disabled
* Features half a dozen brutal, beautifully shot rape scenes
* Musical score is menacing and disturbing
* Lead actress is cute and subjected to horrific humiliation
* Boasts a graphic scene in which lead actress rips out her pubic hair and says "Dirty, dirty, dirty" over and over again
* Delivers a mid-film plot surprise that further brutalizes a rape victim
* Ends violently
* Has no compunctions about offending everyone
NEGATIVES
* Actors playing the disabled are out of control (they are parodies)
* Story has zero credibility

Billy Tang's Run and Kill ('93)
POSITIVES
* Has an award-winning psycho performance from Simon Yam
* Stunning cinematography
* Gruesome, sadistic, tough as nails staging of violence
* Boasts the protracted burning to death of a little girl
* Psycho has a conversation with the charred remains of said girl
* The head of said girl is knocked off
* Enthusiastic use of large, sharp knives
* Depicts garroting in a gleeful manner
* Features a big, fat man (Kent Chang) in a sympathetic lead role
* Gives us Chang's mother plunging to her death
* Increasingly nihilistic atmosphere
* Danny Lee plays a cop (again)
* Fetishistic attention given to scenes of retribution
* Depressing score that offers no hope
NEGATIVES
* Slow to get going
* Not an entirely believable set-up
* Some silly music over opening scenes

Dr. Lamb ('92), directed by Billy Tang and Danny Lee.
POSITIVES
* Stunning photography by Kin Fai Miu
* Outstanding lead performance by Simon Yam
* Argento-esque climax
* Exquisitely directed scenes of necrophilia
* Realistic breast removal and amateur surgery
* Expertly staged moving car sequences
* Chilling score
* Inspired use of rain
* Bloody dismemberment with an electric saw
* Solid direction
* Fast pace
* Wallows in bodily fluids and every paraphilia imaginable
NEGATIVES
* Inappropriate and disruptive use of black humor such as a flying, severed breast landing on the back of a policewoman.
* This type of humor didn't do The Untold Story any favors, either.
Your thoughts?
Labels:
Bill Lustig,
Billy Tang,
Dr. Lamb,
Maniac,
Red To Kill,
Run and Kill,
The Untold Story
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











